<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can we trust Wikipedia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/03/08/can-we-trust-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/03/08/can-we-trust-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:46:35 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tendencias Digitales</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/03/08/can-we-trust-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Tendencias Digitales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=43#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] más que nada de opiniones desencontradas que se encuentran en la web. No se encuentran errores conceptuales importantes que no se solucionen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] más que nada de opiniones desencontradas que se encuentran en la web. No se encuentran errores conceptuales importantes que no se solucionen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/03/08/can-we-trust-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=43#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Cheers Sam. Wikipedia and TV? Sounds like a match made in heaven: the (to borrow a Thomist turn of phrase) unsubstantiated informing the uneducated?

No, I hadn&#039;t seen the report - thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Sam. Wikipedia and TV? Sounds like a match made in heaven: the (to borrow a Thomist turn of phrase) unsubstantiated informing the uneducated?</p>
<p>No, I hadn&#8217;t seen the report &#8211; thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Farrow</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/03/08/can-we-trust-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Farrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=43#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Recently a relative of mine, who is &quot;in TV&quot; was bemoaning how her researchers are increasingly using Wikipedia to conduct research for her shows, saying &quot;Well I could do that myself&quot;.

My reply was - &quot;well, why don&#039;t you&quot;

Also have you seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf&quot; title=&quot;What is Web 2.0. Ideas, technologies and implication for education&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt; which is an interesting perspective on Web 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently a relative of mine, who is &#8220;in TV&#8221; was bemoaning how her researchers are increasingly using Wikipedia to conduct research for her shows, saying &#8220;Well I could do that myself&#8221;.</p>
<p>My reply was &#8211; &#8220;well, why don&#8217;t you&#8221;</p>
<p>Also have you seen <a href="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf" title="What is Web 2.0. Ideas, technologies and implication for education" rel="nofollow">this </a> which is an interesting perspective on Web 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

