<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NPSC Blog &#187; linking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/tag/linking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Page Rank hiccup</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/10/28/google-pagerank-hiccup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/10/28/google-pagerank-hiccup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine fatigue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday morning I saw an interesting item in my feed reader from Darren Rowse at Problogger. The evening before, Darren had posted about his PageRank dropping from a 7 to a 4, in the space of a few hours. He was, naturally, concerned at this unexpected turn of events. As the story unfolded, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="thumb" src="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/wp-content/themes/npsc2/images2/google.gif" title="Google logo" alt="Google logo" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />On Thursday morning I saw an interesting item in my feed reader from Darren Rowse at <a class="external" href="http://www.problogger.net/" title="Darren Rowse: Problogger home">Problogger</a>. The evening before, Darren had posted about <a class="external" href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/10/24/problogger-pagerank-4/" title="Darren's post on the page rank drop">his PageRank dropping</a> from a 7 to a 4, in the space of a few hours. He was, naturally, concerned at this unexpected turn of events. As the story unfolded, it turns out that he was not the only blogger to see their page rank tank.</p>
<p>Some background. <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank" title="Wikipedia: page rank article">PageRank</a> is the patented algorithm that Google uses to determine where your page sits on the return page of a search query. This means that a high page rank is, potentially, a very lucrative commodity:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It can be an effective and viable marketing strategy to buy link advertisements on content pages of quality and relevant sites to drive traffic and increase a webmaster&#8217;s link popularity. However, Google has publicly warned webmasters that if they are or were discovered to be selling links for the purpose of conferring PageRank and reputation, their links will be devalued (ignored in the calculation of other pages&#8217; PageRanks).<br />
<cite><a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank#Manipulating_PageRank" title="Wikipedia: gaming PageRank">Wikipedia</a></cite>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As Darren and many others found out this week, Google&#8217;s warning went from a bark to a bite. It seems there was a <a class="external" href="http://searchengineland.com/071024-093938.php" title="search engine land post on the update">PageRank update</a> and Google decided to penalize those who were selling links.</p>
<p>Fair enough, you say. In the same week that saw research released showing 7 out of 10 American&#8217;s experience <q><a class="external" href="http://searchengineland.com/071023-093541.php" title="search engine land post on state of search research">search engine fatigue</a></q>, who doesn&#8217;t want to see <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_farm" title="Wikipedia: link farms">link farms</a> torched?</p>
<p>Incidentally, the reality of search engine fatigue for the average user is not to be underestimated:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>More than three out of four (75.1 percent) of those who experience search engine fatigue report getting up and physically leaving their computer without the information they were seeking – either &#8220;always,&#8221; &#8220;usually&#8221; or &#8220;sometimes.&#8221; <br />
<cite><a class="external" href="http://searchengineland.com/071023-093541.php" title="search engine land post on state of search research">search engine land</a></cite>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>However, as Mashable pointed out with their wonderfully titled post, <a class="external" href="http://mashable.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank/" title="Mashable post on the page rank imbroglio">Three Clicks to Spam: Google’s Hypocritical Link Selling Policy</a>, it is a little rich for Google to take the high road when they are <a class="external" href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/revenues_q307.html" title="Google 3rd Quarter earnings">turning record profits</a> doing exactly this. AdWords anyone?</p>
<p>Now, in terms of reputation management, antagonizing high profile bloggers by threatening their income is probably not the smartest move for any organization &mdash; unless you are Google. Third quarter earnings of $4.23<em>billion</em> and a virtual monopoly on search apparently mean you can pretty much ignore the whole thing.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right. Despite the fact they run dozens of corporate blogs, Google just toughed this one out. Not a peep. Both the <a class="external" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/" title="As you would expect...">Official Google Blog</a> and the <a class="external" href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/" title="Google blog for web tools">Webmaster Central Blog</a> studiously ignored the issue. There may have been official comment through another channel, but I couldn&#8217;t find it (search engine fatigue, alas).</p>
<p>Darren finished the week with <a class="external" href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/10/27/the-google-page-rank-pendulum-swings-again/" title="Problogger: forget page rank"> nice post capturing the lessons</a> that he learned, but despite him getting his page rank back, for me the story was a more cautionary tale.</p>
<p>Google <em>is</em> the <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/05/20/channel-selection/" title="Post on Google's pivital role in content delivery">800lb gorilla</a> and, despite <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_Be_Evil" title="Don't be Evil: Wikipedia">their vaunted motto</a>, the extent to which we rely on search &ndash; and on linking strategies, means that you would hope for a slightly more transparent and engaged approach from them in these circumstances.</p>
<p>Perhaps more terrifying though, is the other finding from the fatigue research; 78 percent of all survey-takers <q>wished Google could read their minds</q>. Apparently the respondents are unaware that they can already do this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/10/28/google-pagerank-hiccup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

