<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NPSC Blog &#187; pew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/tag/pew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wikipedia and public sector edits</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 00:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikiscanner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blogosphere has been running hot this week with posts about a tool that allows you to track all of an organization&#8217;s edits of particular Wikipedia pages.
The data-mining tool, WikiScanner, which compiles and mashes up information that has always been available, matches IP addresses with the edits stored in the history pages in Wikipedia. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="thumb" src="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/wp-content/themes/npsc2/images2/wikipedia-fingered.gif" title="Wikipedia - thanks for the edit..." alt="Wikipedia logo w/ fingerprint" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />The blogosphere has been running hot this week with posts about a tool that allows you to track all of an organization&#8217;s edits of particular Wikipedia pages.</p>
<p>The data-mining tool, <a class="external" href="http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/" title="List anonymous wikipedia edits from interesting organizations">WikiScanner</a>, which compiles and mashes up information that has always been available, matches <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address" title="Wikipedia: IP address"><acronym title="Internet Protocol">IP</acronym> addresses</a> with the edits stored in the history pages in Wikipedia. The result? Well, let&#8217;s just say that for some organizations, it has been a little embarrassing&#8230;</p>
<p>Some of the first organizations to get <a class="external" href="http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/08/wiki_tracker?currentPage=1" title="Wired article on the WikiScanner">outed for whitewashing</a> their articles were <a class="external" href="http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=204.151.249.0-255&#038;ip2=208.228.181.0-255&#038;ip3=199.222.74.0-255&#038;ip4=65.196.80.0-255&#038;ip5=206.171.73.0-7&#038;ip6=81.188.24.160-167&#038;ip7=65.243.24.0-255" title="Diebold edits">Diebold</a> and <a class="external" href="http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=161.163.0.0-165.199.255&#038;ip2=63.167.77.0-79.255&#038;ip3=63.167.76.0-255" title="Wal-Mart edits">Wal-Mart</a>. Of course, it wasn&#8217;t long before public sector organizations were also being exposed: in this case, the <a class="external" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1642896020070816?feedType=RSS&#038;feedName=technologyNews&#038;rpc=22&#038;sp=true" title="Reuters: CIA, FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits">FBI and CIA</a>.</p>
<p>The question you are all asking now is, what about my agency? Well, preliminary investigations revealed that, yes, some diligent New Zealand public servants had been editing their agency&#8217;s Wikipedia page.</p>
<p>Now, there is nothing wrong with this practice, per se. Given that Wikipedia is such a heavily used resource, (according to this <a class="external" href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/212/source/rss/report_display.asp" title="Pew survey: 36% of online Americans use Wikipedia">Pew survey</a>, <q>Wikipedia has become the number 1 external site visited after Google&#8217;s search page, receiving over half of its traffic from the search engine</q>), if your agency does have <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_sector_organisations_in_New_Zealand" title="State sector organizations nin Wikipedia">a page</a> then you want to make sure that it is correct. What you <em>don&#8217;t</em> want to be doing is spinning or misrepresenting the truth.</p>
<p>The other thing you really don&#8217;t want to be doing &ndash;particularly from your work machine&ndash; is <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&#038;oldid=147948322" title="Wikipedia: Steve Maharey">editing the page of your Minister</a> (or anyone else in Parliament, for that matter).</p>
<p>Now, none of this is in the same class as Exxon Mobil editing the <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&#038;oldid=8931861" title="Rewriting history...">Exxon Valdez oil spill page</a>, which is nothing short of breathtaking in its audacity and, given the transparency of Wikipedia, <em>idiotic</em> in its execution.</p>
<p>It does, however, remind us all that reputation management on the Internet is a very different discipline. Google never forgets, and neither does Wikipedia. Every edit on this mammoth site is preserved for posterity. And, unless you are using <a class="external" href="http://proxy.org/" title="Anonymous web surfing">a proxy</a>, each and every of those edits is traceable back to the organization that made them.</p>
<p>If you are going to effectively manage your agency&#8217;s reputation in this space, remember that, as a public servant, you are held to a <a class="external" href="http://www.ssc.govt.nz/code" title="Code of Conduct">higher standard</a>. Make sure you have a thorough understanding of how social media work, and the <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/02/19/principles-public-sector-socialmedia/" title="Post on principles of social media in the public sector">principles you should be observing</a> when you interact with them.</p>
<h3>Update: 24/8/07</h3>
<p>The Sydney Morning Herald has an article on <a class="external" href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/pms-wikipedia-whiteout/2007/08/23/1187462441687.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1" title="SMH: PM's staff edited Wikipedia">Australian public servants editing Wikipedia</a>, that really highlights the pitfalls of not understanding the social media you are interacting with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/08/19/wikipedia-public-sector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

