<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NPSC Blog &#187; principles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/tag/principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The (real) cost of social media</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/10/07/cost-of-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/10/07/cost-of-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moderation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have posted previously about arguments for social media and a business case for a blog. And while there is plenty of discussion about the ROI of blogging in particular and social media in general, for public sector communicators it is important that we understand what we are committing our organizations to when we launch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="thumb" src="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/wp-content/themes/npsc2/images2/cash.jpg" title="Flickr Creative Commons image: Untitled" alt="Untitled - a Flickr image by Eduard Szekesi" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />I have posted previously about <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/05/20/channel-selection/" title="Post on channel selection">arguments for social media</a> and a <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/06/16/blog-business-case/" title="Post on business case">business case for a blog</a>. And while there is <a class="external" href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=roi+%2B+blogging&#038;btnG=Search" title="Google: blogging + ROI">plenty of discussion</a> about the <acronym title="Return on Investment">ROI</acronym> of blogging in particular and social media in general, for public sector communicators it is important that we understand what we are committing our organizations to when we launch social media as part of a strategy.</p>
<p>Launching a blog or wiki is easy &ndash; it is literally a matter of minutes, not hours. The real cost, or rather the <em>investment</em>, is in ensuring the regular flow of quality content and in moderating and participating in the resulting conversations.</p>
<p>In this post I won&#8217;t look at the issue of generating quality content to a merciless deadline, for two reasons. If this hasn&#8217;t already occurred to you then your social media strategy is in the sort of shape that no amount of further commentary will salvage and, secondly, producing <em>non</em>-quality content &ndash;but doing it with clockwork regularity&ndash; has always worked for me&#8230;</p>
<h2>Moderation</h2>
<p>I touched on this when I wrote the <a class="external" href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/02/19/principles-public-sector-socialmedia/" title="Post on 10 principles for public sector social media">principles for public sector social media</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>6. <strong>Timeliness</strong>: post regularly and be prepared to engage people when it suits them. This may mean checking comments or making edits after work hours and on weekends &mdash; <a class="external" href="http://www.enviroblog.org/2006/09/mcdonalds_allowing_coments_aft.htm" title="Blog post on McDonald's blogging snafu">be prepared to make that effort</a>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This may seem difficult for some senior public servants to grasp, but the reality of engaging with social media is that it can&#8217;t be restricted between 8:30 and 5:00.</p>
<p>An example: when we first dipped our toe in the water earlier this year, with a guest post on <a class="external" href="http://publicaddress.net/default,3964.sm#post" title="Speaker: Seeking Democracy 2.0">Public Address</a>, the post went up on Thursday and, inevitably, the comments <a class="external" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/topic,244,speaker_seeking_democracy_20.sm" title="Public Address System: comments on Democracy 2.0">continued over the weekend</a>, effectively leaving us out of the conversation. <em>Not</em> particularly well planned on our part&#8230;</p>
<p>This is will be less of an issue for younger public servants who are permanently plugged into the matrix. They will have comments forwarded to their Gmail accounts (<acronym title="also known as">aka</acronym> <a class="external" href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2007/02/transform_gmail.html" title="Micro Persuasion: Gmail as your nerve center">nerve center</a>) which they will access via mobile devices, meaning they can clear comments on the fly, day or night.</p>
<p>Of course, it is not just about moderating and responding to comments in a timely fashion, it is also about managing the volume of contributions. The Police Act Review wiki <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/09/26/social-media-govt-consultation/" title="Post on Police wiki">I posted about last week</a> was very quickly overwhelmed by the volume of contributions, resulting in it being <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/planspark/1454889832/in/set-72157600945567938/" title="Flickr image of the closed notice: 29-9-07">shut down</a> only days after it was launched.</p>
<p>Adequate resourcing for moderation, related to both time and volume, definitely needs to be factored into the planning of public sector social media sites.</p>
<h2>Participation</h2>
<p>Again, when I posted the principles I recommended that agencies think about more than just their own sites when they utilize social media:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>9. <strong>Participation</strong>: don’t just focus on your site and expect your publics to find, engage and maintain a conversation. Get out among similarly oriented communities and participate there. Post comments, email other bloggers and recognize that your site is only part of the solution.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This <em>is</em> time intensive. You not only have to respond to people that visit your site and leave comments or edits, you will need to follow any <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackback" title="Wikipedia: trackback">trackbacks</a> to other blogs and, perhaps, comment there.</p>
<p>You will need a good understanding of the other social media sites covering your particular niche, and you will need to develop relationships with some of them. Don&#8217;t underestimate how much time this involves. Colin at SoSaidThe.Organization has an <a class="external" href="http://www.sosaidthe.org/2007/09/15/blogger-and-social-media-outreach-code-for-government/" title="Post on blogger outreach">excellent post on public sector blogger outreach</a> that captures the complexity of this part of your strategy.</p>
<p>This is compounded by the fact that, as a government agency, you will also need to be much more discriminating about which other sites you link to as, all disclaimers aside, linking is a form of endorsement.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Social media, like blogs and wikis, offer public sector communicators tremendous opportunities to more effectively engage with their publics. The (apparent) simplicity of the tools and the ease with which they can be deployed can mask some of the real costs of using these tools in the ways that those same publics will <em>expect that you use them</em>.</p>
<p>I would be interested in the views of those readers who are not public servants as to what your expectations are around the government&#8217;s use of social media. Do you expect 7 day a week moderation and responses to your comments? Prompt attention to trackbacks and engagement in distributed conversations? Or are you happy with <a class="external" href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/CU0605/S00252.htm" title="Scoop: Glide Time release">glide time?</a></p>
<p class="imgcredit">Photo: <a class="external" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/eduard_szekesi/1095197197/" title="Flickr CC">Eduard</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/10/07/cost-of-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Principles for public sector social media</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/02/19/principles-public-sector-socialmedia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/02/19/principles-public-sector-socialmedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[govt2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog2/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have worked through your communications strategy, evaluated all of your options and channels and the most appropriate course of action is a social media solution (blog, wiki or podcast), then here are some points that you may want to consider before you rush off and launch.
 Please note, I am only covering corporate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="thumb" src="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/wp-content/themes/npsc2/images2/gears.gif" title="The machinery of blogging..." alt="Image of gears - decorative" />If you have worked through your communications strategy, evaluated <em>all</em> of your options and channels and the most appropriate course of action is a social media solution (blog, wiki or podcast), then here are some points that you may want to consider before you rush off and launch.</p>
<p> Please note, I am only covering corporate projects here, if you are a public servant and you want to start your own blog, then these may apply, but the advice is <em>intended for</em> government public affairs staff working on their agency projects.</p>
<p>There are 10 principles to consider:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Sovereignty</strong>: do <em>not</em> use an (external) hosted solution, eg blogger. If this is an agency initiative, then you should host the site in the <a class="external" href="http://dns.govt.nz" title="Government Registrar">.govt.nz namespace</a>. I would recommend <a class="external" href="http://wordpress.org/" title="WordPress site">WordPress</a>, as a powerful, extensible and semantic publishing platform. It is also open source, so it is free and easy to deploy, meaning there is no significant cost to the taxpayer to set up.</li>
<li><strong>Access</strong>: the site <em>must</em> be <a class="external" href="http://www.e.govt.nz/standards/web-guidelines/" title="E-government web standards site">Government Web Standards</a> compliant. If it is funded by the taxpayer, then it should be accessible to <em>all</em> New Zealanders. This is another good reason for choosing WordPress as your solution.</li>
<li><strong>Transparency</strong>: make it very clear who is posting (do <em>not</em> claim that your <acronym title="Chief executive">CE</acronym> is writing the posts if they are being ghostwritten by you and your team), and how to contact them, online and off. This is one instance where you are not an <a class="external" href="http://www.ssc.govt.nz/political-neutrality-fact-sheet-1" title="State Services Commission: Political Neutrality fact sheet">anonymous public servant</a>. Similarly, (and I know I don&#8217;t need to tell you this) <em>no</em> <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake_blog" title="Wikipedia entry on fake blogs">flogs</a>, <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2006/10/18/astroturfing/" title="Post on astroturfing">astroturf</a> or <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/02/12/sock-puppets/" title="Post on sockpuppets">sockpuppets</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Trust</strong>: do <em>not</em> disclaim the content on the blog/wiki/podcast etc. If you are engaging your publics through these media they should be able to expect a straightforward exchange of ideas and information. If your Legal team intend on vetting every post, the venture is doomed.</li>
<li><strong>Fairness</strong>: social media is about reciprocity, if you are going to engage and invite comment then accept the good with the bad. Post a very clear comments policy and stick to it. Don&#8217;t delete comments because they are critical of your agency or policies.</li>
<li><strong>Timeliness</strong>: post regularly and be prepared to engage people when it suits them. This may mean checking comments or making edits after work hours and on weekends &mdash; <a class="external" href="http://www.enviroblog.org/2006/09/mcdonalds_allowing_coments_aft.htm" title="Blog post on McDonald's blogging snafu">be prepared to make that effort</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Openness</strong>: share content that is an honest reflection of your thinking and position. Don&#8217;t set up a social media channel to broadcast your risk-averse, legal-approved and comprehensively <acronym title="quality assured">qa&#8217;ed</acronym> copy. Remember, this is about engaging people, not boring them into apathy&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Ethics</strong>: respect what you can legitimately say about your agency/project in public. No matter how small you think your audience, once you hit the &#8216;publish&#8217; button your content is in the public domain. Make sure you don&#8217;t surprise your Minister this way&#8230;</li>
<li><strong>Participation</strong>: don&#8217;t just focus on your site and expect your publics to find, engage and maintain a conversation. Get out among similarly oriented communities and participate there. Post comments, email other bloggers and recognize that your site is only part of the solution.</li>
<li><strong>Integrity</strong>: at <em>all times</em> measure your actions against the <a class="external" href="http://www.ssc.govt.nz/coc/" title="Public Service Code of Conduct">Code of Conduct</a>. If you think that you are close to the line with a post, or a comment, check with someone who has some distance from the issue &mdash; or hold off posting for overnight. Once it is published, <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/category/reputation-management/" tile="Posts about reputation management">there is no taking it back</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>Of course, none of this should come as a surprise. In most cases we are just talking about common sense and sound judgement. It is probably not an exhaustive list either, so if you have suggestions, please add them in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/02/19/principles-public-sector-socialmedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

