<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NPSC Blog &#187; reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/tag/reporting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social media metrics</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/03/24/social-media-metrics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/03/24/social-media-metrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outputs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/03/24/social-media-metrics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, while looking at the effectiveness of microformatting government media releases, the vexed issue of metrics reared it&#8217;s head. Vexed, because it is an ongoing issue for communicators, public sector and otherwise, to collate and report communcations metrics; even more so for the newer social media tools.
The sense of dissatisfaction I felt with my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="thumb" src="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/wp-content/themes/npsc2/images2/tape-measure.jpg" title="Flickr Creative Commons image: Tape Measure" alt="Tape Measure - a Flickr image by PPDIGITAL" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />Last week, while looking at the effectiveness of <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/03/16/govt-smr-gamma/" title="Post on the gamma version hRelease">microformatting government media releases</a>, the vexed issue of metrics reared it&#8217;s head. Vexed, because it is an ongoing issue for communicators, public sector and otherwise, to collate and report communcations metrics; even more so for the newer social media tools.</p>
<p>The sense of dissatisfaction I felt with my inability to quantify the benefits of a semantic media release and a series of discussions that I have had with colleagues over the last couple of weeks about reporting and metrics triggered some initial thoughts on this issue. There is also a heightened interest in measuring social media around the blogosphere, John Johansen&#8217;s post on <a class="external" href="http://originalcomment.blogspot.com/2008/03/social-media-metrics-metaphors.html" title="Original Comment post">social media metrics metaphors</a> over the weekend is a good example.</p>
<h2>The framework</h2>
<p>In arriving at a workable solution for social media metrics the first point that occurred to me is that we shouldn&#8217;t overlook the fact that these metrics are only a small part of the picture. Ideally, what you measure and report against is your total strategy, not just the social media element(s).</p>
<p>The strategy would be assessed against achievement of the outputs in your <a class="external" href="http://www.ssc.govt.nz/display/document.asp?docid=5689&#038;pageno=3#P28_1993" title="SSC guidance on SOIs">Statement of Intent</a>. The SOI provides the basic framework for the reporting, this can be further broken down into inputs, outputs and outcomes &ndash; and metrics established for each of these categories.</p>
<p>The mechanics of this process are self-evident. Social media inputs, for example, are relatively straightforward: time spent writing content, moderating and interacting with commenters and others, numbers of posts, pages created, or podcast episodes.</p>
<p>Outputs can be similarly reported as comments, subscribers, saves to del.icio.us or diggs, <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pingback" title="Wikipedia entry on pingback">pingbacks</a>, the degree to which your content goes <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/12/02/censoring-social-media/" title="Post on viral strategies">viral</a> (remember, we are talking about government here, so let&#8217;s not get <em>too</em> excited&#8230;).</p>
<p>Obviously, these metrics will also depend upon where you are in your social media maturity cycle. To borrow the <a href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/09/01/social-media-control/#comment-596" title="David's comment on using this acronym"><acronym title="monitor, analyze, interact, lead">MAIL</acronym> acronym</a> from <a class="external" href="http://www.prworks.ca" title="David's site">David Jones</a>, your inputs and outputs will vary according to whether you are monitoring, interacting or leading. You should <em>always</em> be analyzing&#8230;</p>
<h2>Outcomes</h2>
<p>Proving a causal link between a policy input and an outcome is not something that can be taken for granted. Extending that causal chain to the communications contribution to a business strategy is frequently an even more difficult and tenuous exercise.</p>
<p>How, then, do we approach the more demanding task of determining what outcomes can be reasonably attributed to a subset of that communications strategy, social media activities? One solution is to ensure that you build in solid evaluative criteria from the outset, and link these to the outputs in the <acronym title="Statement of Intent">SOI</acronym>.</p>
<p>Measuring the impact of social media initiatives on your organization&#8217;s ability to successfully engage with its publics is unlikely to be restricted to a single input or output &ndash; it will be multi-dimensional. Ensure that you have a matrix of criteria; aggregation will present a more compelling case.</p>
<p class="imgcredit">Photo: <a class="external" href="http://flickr.com/photos/ppdigital/2327029777/" title="Flickr CC">PPDIGITAL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/03/24/social-media-metrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
