<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NPSC Blog &#187; social software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/tag/social-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog</link>
	<description>The public affairs practice in New Zealand Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:27:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Networked citizens</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/11/02/networked-citizens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/11/02/networked-citizens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 07:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal-communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demos, the UK think tank, this week published a pamphlet on the impact of social networks in the workplace. Called Network Citizens, the report is a qualitative study of six workplaces that documents their internal and external networks. Unsurprisingly, much of the focus is on the role of technology, and how it is changing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="thumb" src="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/wp-content/themes/npsc2/images2/socnet.jpg" title="Flickr Creative Commons image: Social Network" alt="Social Network - a Flickr image by luc legay" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />Demos, the UK think tank, this week published a pamphlet on the impact of social networks in the workplace. Called <a class="external" href="http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/networkcitizens" title="Demos report page">Network Citizens</a>, the report is a qualitative study of six workplaces that documents their internal and external networks. Unsurprisingly, much of the focus is on the role of technology, and how it is changing the nature and scale of networking.</p>
<p>Many public sector agencies view access to social networks, the likes of <a class="external" href="http://facebook.com/" title="MySpace in boat shoes...">Facebook</a>, <a class="external" href="http://twitter.com/" title="Ambient awareness tool">Twitter</a> and &ndash; incomprehensibly &ndash; <a class="external" href="http://linkedin.com" title="Professional networking">LinkedIn</a>, with what can only be described as either fear or deep suspicion. Some of them even go so far as to block access to these sites:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8230;these technologies are most often though of as <em>social</em> &ndash; more pleasure than business. When discussed in the context of work, they have tended to be regarded as a drain on productivity, a leaking of people&#8217;s social lives into office hours.<br />
<cite><a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Network%20citizens%20-%20web.pdf" title="Download the report as a PDF">Network Citizens</a></cite> [PDF 356 KB], p.17</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That last clause is a telling one. As if, in the minds of the people that think blocking access to these sites will make people more productive (or protect them from themselves&#8230;), there is some sort of impermeable divide between what we do at work and who we are.</p>
<p> The fact of the matter is that professional public servants, like any knowledge workers, rely on a range of competencies in their roles. And many of those competencies are based on interpersonal skills. In short, in order to just do their jobs passably well, they need to be able to interact with a range of people inside and outside the organization. In order to <em>excel</em> at their job, they need to be able to draw on the knowledge and experience of their networks.</p>
<p>Given the economic crisis that we are facing, and the constrictive impact that this will have on agency budgets, the imperative to develop <a href="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/05/11/future-of-comms/" title="Post on the future of communications">higher levels of staff engagement</a> (and the resulting increases in productivity) is paramount. As the authors of the report note:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>These social ties are strong predictors of wellbeing at work; to that extent, <em>networked firms are happy firms, too</em>.<br />
<cite>p.27</cite>, my emphasis</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course, there are risks associated with new technologies. Or, more particularly, with the <em>behaviours</em> that these technologies enable. The case yesterday of the <a class="external" href="http://news.smh.com.au/technology/virgin-atlantic-sacks-13-staff-after-facebook-criticism-20081101-5fpm.html" title="SMH article on the dismissals">Virgin employees dismissed</a> for comments on Facebook is a good example. It highlights the need for appropriate guidance to ensure employees can use the tools confidently and responsibly.</p>
<p>Weighed against the alternative approach, blocking access, this risk is at least manageable; and in the short term. The implications of blocking will likely be far more deleterious. First, for many skilled and connected professionals, a disconnected workplace will be the equivalent of a career backwater. Second, from an organizational point of view, you are effectively abandoning what is now a competitive advantage and will soon be the industry standard.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Attempts to control employees&#8217; use of social networking software in the office may end up damaging the organisation in the long run by depleting its network capital.<br />
p.72</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One other interesting aspect that this paper raised was seeing it through the context of a larger, quantitative piece of research. Earlier this year, academics at Harvard Business School published a fascinating <a class="external" href=" http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/5994.html#wp-3" title="Communications paper from HBS: precis page">analysis of the communications activities</a> of a multi-national organization.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The data we analyze include the complete record, as drawn from the firm&#8217;s servers, of e-mail communications and scheduled meetings (both face-to-face and conference calls) among 30,328 people during an observation period of roughly three months.<br />
<cite><a href="http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-004.pdf" title="Download the report as a PDF">Communication (and Coordination?) in a Modern, Complex Organization</a>, [PDF 645 KB] p. 12</cite></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The conclusion that the authors reach suggests to me that, rather than adopt a suspicious or sceptical view of social software, organizations would be well advised to accelerate the use of these networks (both in terms of the technology and the behavioural aspects). For public sector agencies, that tend to be more hierarchical and siloed anyway, these tools offer opportunities to improve internal communications, lift engagement and &ndash; in what would admittedly amount to a <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_Convergence" title="Wikipedia article: almost too flaky to click through...">harmonic convergence</a> &ndash; promote innovative and transformative practice.</p>
<p>The authors found that:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The overall conclusion to emerge from the dyad-level analysis is that organizational structure and geographic space sharply delimit patterns of exchange. Social categories also influence propensities to interact, but the magnitudes of their effects are modest relative to those of organizational structure and the (organizationally assigned) spatial organization of BigCo.<br />
<cite>p. 37</cite></p>
</blockquote>
<p>The message is clear. Understand <a href="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/04/28/change-management/" title="Social media and change management">the change that is happening</a> inside your agencies. Ensure that you provide people the sorts of tools that will allow them to develop professionally and to invest and grow their social capital. Attempts to restrict the ability of your staff to build their networks (online or off) will only result in a disengaged workforce that expends most of its ingenuity trying to <a href="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2007/03/18/public-sector-comms-hacks/" title="Post on hacks">get around your blocks</a> in order to find a job that is both fulfilling and professionally relevant.</p>
<p class="imgcredit">Photo: <a class="external" href="http://flickr.com/photos/luc/1824234195/" title="Flickr CC">luc legay</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/11/02/networked-citizens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog Open Week</title>
		<link>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/02/10/blog-open-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/02/10/blog-open-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/02/10/blog-open-week/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week it is your opportunity to put the social in social media
When I started this blog, there were two primary reasons that drove me to the keyboard week in and week out and, after a period of reflection, I have decided that I haven&#8217;t been at all successful in the second. And while I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="thumb" src="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/wp-content/themes/npsc2/images2/open-door.jpg" title="Flickr Creative Commons image: Open Door" alt="Trust - a Flickr image by yewenyi" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" /><em>This week it is your opportunity to put the</em> social <em>in social media</em></p>
<p>When I started this blog, there were two primary reasons that drove me to the keyboard week in and week out and, after a period of reflection, I have decided that I haven&#8217;t been at all successful in the second. And while I am not trying to lead you to <a class="external" href="http://twitter.com/jasonwryan/statuses/563162832" title="Twitter post on progress toward goal 1">an inference about the first</a>, I remain confident that the remedy lies within my own reach.</p>
<p>The first reason was to learn as much about social media in the public sector &ndash; in as public and transparent a fashion &ndash; as possible. To write about it and to engage with colleagues and peers. Pretty straightforward.</p>
<p>The second, equally important, reason was to provide a forum for colleagues, peers, interested readers et al (you), to interact and experiment with social media. Looking back over the last year and a half, there hasn&#8217;t been too much of that. This post is an attempt to change that.</p>
<h2>Come on out</h2>
<p>Looking through the visitor numbers to the site I have a good idea of the ratio of readers to commenters and while it is reasonable to expect that social sites will generally have a fairly predictable breakdown of active/passive visitors (<a class="external" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/jul/20/guardianweeklytechnologysection2" title="Guardian article on participation in social media">the 1% rule</a>), for communicators I think we can and should do better.</p>
<p>This is your chance. Stop <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lurker" title="Wikipedia article: lurker">lurking</a> (even if only for this one post) and come out and introduce yourself. Tell everyone a little about yourself, where you are from, your work and your interests in terms of communications, social media etc. Get social.</p>
<p>If you have other social media profiles, include links to them. Your blog, <a class="external" href="http://del.icio.us/jasonwryan" title="My del.icio.us bookmarks">bookmarks</a>, <a class="external" href="http://twitter.com/jasonwryan" title="My Twitter stream">Twitter</a> or Tumblr accounts, your online feed reader, <a class="external" href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonwryan" title="My LinkedIn profile">LinkedIn</a> profile, whatever&#8230; Anything that will help all of us connect with others who share what is after all (if you read this blog regularly) a fairly obscure interest.</p>
<p>If you would like to do more than introduce yourself, you are encouraged to submit your thoughts about the blog, especially if it involves suggesting directions or areas of interest for 2008.</p>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t be shy: start mingling.</p>
<p class="imgcredit">Photo: <a class="external" href="http://flickr.com/photos/yewenyi/343838640/" title="Flickr CC">yewenyi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.psnetwork.org.nz/blog/2008/02/10/blog-open-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

